Hi Laura,

 

I do not see any palaeontology under the heading “Taxonomic Type”

Based on past experience I know that most geologists and mineralogists would object to the usage of the word taxonomy for a classification involving their objects.

 

Under “Storage classification”

 

I assume “Handspecimens” is a direct translation for German “Handstück” – this is not in common usage. I would strongly support the term “Macrofossil” instead

 

I also second Steffen’s comment reg. Microfossils

 

Thin sections could be a separate category – since these can be both micro- or macrofossil in origin

 

Like Steffen I never saw fossil liquids, but what does exist are macrofossils stored in liquid (alcohol or glycerine) – I would simply have classified these as “Macrofossils”, but if you want to put emphasis on storage concerns they could be keyed out as separate category

 

Very commonly very large objects are stored in separate storage areas in collections – so again, if the focus is storage these could form a separate category (“Oversized specimens” or similar)

 

Often, fossil bearing sieving residues are stored alongside microfossil collections – often in different cabinets or even rooms – again possibly a different category.

 

Many collections separate any vertebrate (or only mammalian) remains from the other fossils and do classify them in “normal sized” bones and micro mammals (or micro vertebrates). I know this is now a mixture of taxonomy and size, but I just want to bring it to your attention as it is common.

 

All the best

Andreas

 

 

 

Dear colleagues,

 

I am writing to kindly ask for your advice on defining the standardised terminology “classification schemes” developed in SYNTHESYS+ for geological, palaeontological collections/objects, and also Extraterrestrial if possible. I realise the current terminology for taxonomic type and storage need urgent revision because they are not really useful. I have made revisions and ask if you agree with my suggestions or to give further input. I am aware that most of you are curators – so with regards to storage: Are my suggestions meaningful? Have I covered the main categories in which geological, palaeontological and Extraterrestrial objects are contained? Please note that it is important not to go into much detailed, the categories should be useful for high-level reporting.

 

Google sheets with my new suggestions (highlighted in green) of categorisation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19hBCnsLkMILmfaFMy_YwcSiUlOVB99z7CDFnkwrrxe8/edit#gid=0

In red are the original terms for comparison.

 

I would please like your feedback before the 20^th December

 

General Terminology to be aware of:  Taxonomic type: This refers to collection type e.g. for Palaeontology: invertebrates, vertebrates,  botany & mycology. For Geology: minerology, petrology etc.

Storage classification: refers to  what form collection objects are stored. This classification aims to be useful for information on building planning, help decision for investment of storage facilities etc.

 

Background

These classification schemes are being developed in  SYNTHESYS+ they will be at the core of describing collections within DiSSCo, and will allow the discoverability, accessibility, mobilisation of collection data held in institutes.  More specifically I am coordinating the task involved in developing a collection digitisation dashboard in which the classification schemes are being developed. The dashboard will provide high level information on collections related to Collection Taxonomic types, Storage, geographic region etc. the goal is to facilitate the discoverability of collections as well as decision making on institutional, governmental and research levels – what facilities are needed, building planning, prioritisation of digitisation, research collaboration etc.

 

 

It is important since we are the community that will be using these terms, and the goal is to promote the use of these terms beyond DiSSCo.

 

I hope my request make sense if not please feel free to contact me.

 

Thank you in advance for your help

 

Best wishes

 

Laura   

 

 

 

 

Dr. Laura Tilley

Project Assistant

CETAF, AISBL

+32 (0) 2 627 42 50

laura.tilley@cetaf.org

 

CONSORTIUM OF EUROPEAN TAXONOMIC FACILITIES

c/o Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

rue Vautier, 29 1000, Brussels. Belgium

www.cetaf.org

 

Exploring and documenting diversity in nature

Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message it is privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. Any  unauthorized use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please reply to the sender and delete this message from your computer.

Be green, read on screen!

 

 

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=VW94oI025f8qRGA3goytUzQisJ4aIjU0