Dear Laura,
Based on my actual work on specimens from museums, quite often the basic data base includes a nomenclature that is accepted worldwide (although the changing on the beginning of the Pleistocene is a recent example of a critical change). What is very important with the classical localities – is to have basic references about the locality available with the collection. Those that are not online and less accessible, is important to have scannings of theses old publications as it is important to have a data base of the actual specimens.
Best,
Rivka
Prof. Rivka Rabinovich,
National Natural History Collections, Institute of Earth Sciences, Institute of Archaeology,
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
Berman Building, Edmond J. Safra campus, Givat Ram
Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Tel. 972-2-6585784
Fax. 972-2-6585782
From: cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com [mailto:cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com] On Behalf Of Schmitt, Ralf Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 9:38 AM
To: cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com
Subject: AW: [CETAF_ESG] Advice need: about how earth science collections defined stratigraphically in institutions.
Dear Laura,
I think also a standard for chronotratigraphy is necessary and the ics timescale is therefore the best solution.
Nevertheless, collection specimens are in most cases sorted based on “old” local stratigraphic names, e.g. Kupferschiefer, Rotliegendes, Quaderkalk, Muschelkalk, Bleiglanzbank. Also inquiries used in most cases these names, e.g. search for silver sample in the Kupferschiefer, agate geode from the Rotliegendes of Thüringer Wald, celestine from the Muschelkalk.
For me it is generally hard to place this “old” local stratigraphic names within these ics timescale, this takes a lot of knowledge and time.
Generally, for portals good solutions must be developed that allows searching based on various different timescales and also common local stratigraphic names.
Best regards,
Ralf
Von: cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com> Im Auftrag von Eder, Johanna
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2019 07:51
An: cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com
Betreff: Re: [CETAF_ESG] Advice need: about how earth science collections defined stratigraphically in institutions.
Dear Laura,
I fully agree with Björn and Steffen. This is the only choice to apply this standard.
Best wishes
Johanna
Am Mo., 14. Okt. 2019 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Kröger, Björn <bjorn.kroger@helsinki.fi>:
Hello Laura,
I am not 100% sure what for these categories are needed and why there is some constraint for the number of categories. But properly defined global chronostratigraphic units are the only choice and I would also go for a hierarchical solution with codes for e.g. the Mesozoic unspecified and then lower in the hierarchy toward the periods. The latest international standard can be found here: http://stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-chart-timescale
Kind regards,
Björn
From: <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com> on behalf of "laura.tilley@cetaf.org" <laura.tilley@cetaf.org>
Reply-To: "cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com" <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com>
Date: Monday, 14 October 2019 at 17:10
To: ESG <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com>
Subject: [CETAF_ESG] Advice need: about how earth science collections defined stratigraphically in institutions.
Dear colleagues,
I am writing to ask for some advice on how I should define the stratigraphic levels for the SYNTHESYS+ Collections Digitisation Dashboard. I have attached an excel sheet with classification of Stratigraphy from the ICEDIG project (sheet 1 in black ink) – I have added some categories in red – but I think there are too many to be filled in. Could Precambrian material be lumped together?
I would like to ask do we need that many categories really? – based on how earth science collections are categorised in institutions.
Do you have any insight into how Earth Science collections are classified?
I need to add a category for unknown.
In sheet two, CSIC Madrid has given an alternative classification.
I would be grateful for any feedback before the end of this week.
Best wishes
Laura
Dr. Laura Tilley
Project Assistant
CETAF, AISBL
+32 (0) 2 627 42 50
CONSORTIUM OF EUROPEAN TAXONOMIC FACILITIES
c/o Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
rue Vautier, 29 1000, Brussels. Belgium
Exploring and documenting diversity in nature
Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message it is privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please reply to the sender and delete this message from your computer.
Be green, read on screen!
To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://archives.simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://archives.simplelists.com
--
__________________________
Prof. Dr. Johanna Eder
Direktorin
Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart
Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
T +49 (0) 711 89 36 - 115
F +49 (0) 711 89 36 - 100
www.naturkundemuseum-bw.de
__________________________________
Sonderausstellung „RIESIG im Meer“
ab 24.10.2019 – 14.6.2020 | Schloss Rosenstein
_________________________________
Bleiben Sie mit uns in Kontakt: Science Blog Facebook Twitter Instagram
Unterstützen Sie das Museum und werden Sie Mitglied im Förderverein!
Informationen zur Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten nach der DSGVO durch das SMNS finden Sie hier.
To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://archives.simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=Uyr8Bk2lGJj70cyYQUZ50Y0UnCPrMk0M