Dear Laura,

 

Fully agree with Björn, Steffen, and Johanna.

The problem with these is not only that correlating them with the international stages requires geological knowledge and time as Ralf pointed out, but also a lot of knowledge on history of science. In many cases different authors or schools have used these terms in different senses, stage XYZ of author A may, for example correlate to the Berriasian of the ICS, but the same stage used by author B may correlate with the Valanginian. Therefore it is not simply a matter of doing the correlation once since a 1:1 correlation is rarely possible.

Additionally, many regional stages do not map to a single international stage, but may, for example include the younger part of one ICS stage and the older part of the succeeding stage (the Badenian regional stage of the Paratethys is a good example).

Because of all these problems we use a separate field for regional and/or outdated term we use in our inventory database.

 

All the best

Andreas

 

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Andreas Kroh
Head of the NHM Vienna Publishing House

Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, Serie A, Editor-in-Chief

Zootaxa, Subject Editor for Echinodermata

Natural History Museum Vienna

Geological-Paleontological Dept.

Burgring 7 – 1010 Vienna – Austria – EU
Tel: 0043-1-52177-576
Fax: 0043-1-52177-459

www.nhm-wien.ac.at/kroh.html

 

World Register of Marine Species

Steering Committee Member & Taxonomic Editor for Echinoidea

http://www.marinespecies.org/echinoidea/

 

OeTyp - Online-Database of palaeontological type specimens in Austrian collections

http://www.oeaw.ac.at/oetyp/palhome.htm

 

 

Von: cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com> Im Auftrag von Eder, Johanna
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2019 07:51
An: cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com
Betreff: Re: [CETAF_ESG] Advice need: about how earth science collections defined stratigraphically in institutions.

 

Dear Laura, 

 

I fully agree with Björn and Steffen. This is the only choice to apply this standard.

Best wishes

Johanna

 

Am Mo., 14. Okt. 2019 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Kröger, Björn <bjorn.kroger@helsinki.fi>:

Hello Laura,

I am not 100% sure what for these categories are needed and why there is some constraint for the number of categories. But properly defined global chronostratigraphic units are the only choice and I would also go for a hierarchical solution with codes for e.g. the Mesozoic unspecified and then lower in the hierarchy toward the periods. The latest international standard can be found here:  http://stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-chart-timescale

Kind regards,

Björn

 

 

From: <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com> on behalf of "laura.tilley@cetaf.org" <laura.tilley@cetaf.org>
Reply-To: "cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com" <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com>
Date: Monday, 14 October 2019 at 17:10
To: ESG <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com>
Subject: [CETAF_ESG] Advice need: about how earth science collections defined stratigraphically in institutions.

 

Dear colleagues,

 

I am writing to ask for some advice on how I should define the stratigraphic levels for the SYNTHESYS+ Collections Digitisation Dashboard. I have attached an excel sheet with classification of Stratigraphy from the  ICEDIG project (sheet 1 in black ink) – I have added some categories in red – but I think there are too many to be filled in. Could Precambrian material be lumped together?

 

I would like to ask do we need that many categories really? – based on how earth science collections are categorised in institutions.

Do you have any insight into how Earth Science collections are classified?

 

I need to add a category for unknown.

 

In sheet two, CSIC Madrid has given an alternative classification.

 

I would be grateful for any feedback before the end of this week.

 

Best wishes

 

Laura

 

Dr. Laura Tilley

Project Assistant

CETAF, AISBL

+32 (0) 2 627 42 50

laura.tilley@cetaf.org

 cid:c25b9fcb-6fab-4aa0-90c6-9864ef4ce100

CONSORTIUM OF EUROPEAN TAXONOMIC FACILITIES

c/o Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

rue Vautier, 29 1000, Brussels. Belgium

www.cetaf.org

 

Exploring and documenting diversity in nature

Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message it is privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. Any  unauthorized use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please reply to the sender and delete this message from your computer.

Be green, read on screen!

 

 

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://archives.simplelists.com

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://archives.simplelists.com


 

--

__________________________
Prof. Dr. Johanna Eder
Direktorin

Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart
Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
+49 (0) 711 89 36 - 115
+49 (0) 711 89 36 - 100
www.naturkundemuseum-bw.de

 

Das Bild wurde vom Absender entfernt.

__________________________________

Sonderausstellung  „RIESIG im Meer“

ab 24.10.2019 – 14.6.2020 | Schloss Rosenstein

_________________________________

Bleiben Sie mit uns in Kontakt: Science Blog Facebook Twitter Instagram

Unterstützen Sie das Museum und werden Sie Mitglied im Förderverein!

Informationen zur Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten nach der DSGVO durch das SMNS finden Sie hier.

 

Das Bild wurde vom Absender entfernt.

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=VW94oI025f8qRGA3goytUzQisJ4aIjU0

--------------------------------------
Information gemaess UGB Par. 14 Abs. 1

Naturhistorisches Museum
1010 Wien, Burgring 7
Firmenbuchnummer: FN 236724z
Firmenbuchgericht: Handelsgericht Wien
UID: ATU 38020609
Rechtsform: Wissenschaftliche Anstalt
oeffentlichen Rechts des Bundes
--------------------------------------