Dear Laura,

same here. The international and official valid scale for chronostratigraphy is here. http://stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-chart-timescale 

Indeed especially column Stage/age is important in combination with local Lithostratigraphy units, this is usually the most important information related to specimen localisation. (together with locality and taxonomy).

Best regards,

Jiri

------ Původní zpráva ------

Od: "Kröger, Björn" <bjorn.kroger@helsinki.fi>

Komu: "cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com" <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com>

Odesláno: 14. 10. 2019 16:23:55

Předmět: Re: [CETAF_ESG] Advice need: about how earth science collections defined stratigraphically in institutions.

Hello Laura,

I am not 100% sure what for these categories are needed and why there is some constraint for the number of categories. But properly defined global chronostratigraphic units are the only choice and I would also go for a hierarchical solution with codes for e.g. the Mesozoic unspecified and then lower in the hierarchy toward the periods. The latest international standard can be found here:  http://stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-chart-timescale

Kind regards,

Björn

 

 

From: <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com> on behalf of "laura.tilley@cetaf.org" <laura.tilley@cetaf.org>
Reply-To: "cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com" <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com>
Date: Monday, 14 October 2019 at 17:10
To: ESG <cetaf_earthsc@cetaf.simplelists.com>
Subject: [CETAF_ESG] Advice need: about how earth science collections defined stratigraphically in institutions.

 

Dear colleagues,

 

I am writing to ask for some advice on how I should define the stratigraphic levels for the SYNTHESYS+ Collections Digitisation Dashboard. I have attached an excel sheet with classification of Stratigraphy from the  ICEDIG project (sheet 1 in black ink) – I have added some categories in red – but I think there are too many to be filled in. Could Precambrian material be lumped together?

 

I would like to ask do we need that many categories really? – based on how earth science collections are categorised in institutions.

Do you have any insight into how Earth Science collections are classified?

 

I need to add a category for unknown.

 

In sheet two, CSIC Madrid has given an alternative classification.

 

I would be grateful for any feedback before the end of this week.

 

Best wishes

 

Laura

 

Dr. Laura Tilley

Project Assistant

CETAF, AISBL

+32 (0) 2 627 42 50

laura.tilley@cetaf.org

 

CONSORTIUM OF EUROPEAN TAXONOMIC FACILITIES

c/o Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

rue Vautier, 29 1000, Brussels. Belgium

www.cetaf.org

 

Exploring and documenting diversity in nature

Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message it is privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. Any  unauthorized use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please reply to the sender and delete this message from your computer.

Be green, read on screen!

 

 

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://archives.simplelists.com